Presiden Joko Widodo resmikan KA BIM (jurnalsumbar) Hari ini, 21 Mei 2018 menjadi momen yang bersejarah dalam dunia perkeretaapian, khususnya kereta bandara. Pasalnya hari ini telah diresmikan pengoperasian kereta bandara ketiga di Tanah Air. Setelah kereta Bandara Soekarno-Hatta dan kereta Bandara Kualanamu, kini di Bandara Internasional Minangkabau di Padang, Sumatera Barat, juga telah beroperasi kereta bandara terbaru dengan balutan warna hijau putih.Baca juga: Tiga Hari Gratis, Ini Dia Harga Resmi Tiket KA Minangkabau EkspresKereta Bandara Minangkabau (KA BIM) secara simbolis hari ini telah diresmikan oleh Presiden Jokowi Widodo yang didampingi Ibu Iriana, Menteri Perhubungan Budi Karya Sumadi, Menteri PUPR Basuki Hadimulyo, Sekretaris Kabinet Pramono Anung dan Gubernur Sumbar Irwan Prayitno ikut menghadiri peresmian KA BIM tersebut. Presiden mengatakan, pembangunan kereta bandara di Padang saat ini merupakan yang ketiga setelah Medan dan Jakarta. Sebenarnya dengan kehadiran KA Bandara ini sendiri untuk memudahkan masyarakat yang kan pergi menuju bandara atau sebaliknya.“Bisa satu jam, bisa dua jam, bisa tiga jam tergantung seperti apa macetnya,” ujar Jokowi yang dikutip KabarPenumpang.com dari Antara (21/5/2018) pada peresmian KA BIM.KA Minangkabau Ekspres yang mengular di jalur kereta Sumatera Barat (Istimewa)Presiden mengatakan, di Padang dengan adanya kereta bandara ini juga agar menarik minat masyarakat menggunakan kereta bandara. Saat ini kereta tersebut untuk tarifnya pemerintah telah memberikan subsidi, sehingga penumpang hanya membayar Rp10 ribu dengan keberangkatan dari Padang ke BIM atau sebaliknya.“Harga itu murah sekali. Coba kalau naik mobil bisa berjam-jam dan lebih mahal ongkosnya,” ujar Jokowi.Harga tiket kereta bandara ini sendiri adalah tarif promo yang berlaku selama enam bulan kedepan. Dalam sehari KA Minangkabau Ekspres ini melayani lima perjalanan pulang pergi dari stasiun Simpang Haru Padang menuju BIM dan mampu mengangkut penumpang mencapai 399 orang.Baca juga: Beroperasi Q1 2018, Kereta Bandara Minangkabau Adopsi Kereta Rel Diesel ListrikJokowi menambahkan, kapasitas tampung BIM akan terus ditingkatkan dari saat ini 2,6 juta penumpang menjadi 5,7 juta penumpang di akhir tahun 2019 mendatang. Seusai meresmikan, Jokowi bersama rombongannya mencoba KA BIM dari bandara Minangkabau menuju ke PadangDiketahui, KA BIM sendiri telah resmi beroperasi pada 1 Mei 2018 kemarin. Seharusnya peresmian KA BIM ini sendiri pada 8 Mei 2018 lalu, tetapi batal tanpa alasan apapun yang dijelaskan. Jalur KA BIM membentang sepanjang 22 km yang melewati empat stasiun, dari Stasiun Padang hingga Stasiun Bandara Internasional Minangkabau (BIM). Kereta ini melintasi 18,1 km jalur KA eksisting antara Stasiun Padang–Stasiun Tabing–Stasiun Duku dan 3,9 km jalur KA baru antara Stasiun Duku–Stasiun BIM.Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading… RelatedTiga Hari Gratis, Ini Dia Harga Resmi Tiket KA Minangkabau Ekspres04/05/2018In “Bandara”Beroperasi Q1 2018, Kereta Bandara Minangkabau Adopsi Kereta Rel Diesel Listrik02/01/2018In “Bandara”Sama-Sama Kereta Bandara, Inilah Yang Beda Antara di Soekarno-Hatta dan Kualanamu05/01/2018In “Bandara”
Tehachapi’s July median was $300,000, down from the record $329,000 set the month before. The Tehachapi July median was up 14.2 percent from a year earlier. Los Angeles County’s July median was a record $522,500, up from $520,000 in June and 7.7 percent ahead of a year earlier. Statewide, the 10 cities and communities with the highest median home prices in California during July 2006 were: Los Altos, $1,652,000; Manhattan Beach, $1,457,750; Burlingame, $1,425,000; Newport Beach, $1,375,000; Rancho Palos Verdes, $1,200,000; Mill Valley, $1,198,000; Lafayette, $1,170,000; Calabasas, $1,138,750; Santa Barbara, $1,047,500; Los Gatos, $1,030,000. Statewide, the 10 cities and communities with the greatest median home price increases in July 2006 compared with the same period a year ago were: Taft, 58.1 percent; Hercules, 35.1 percent; Morgan Hill, 33 percent; Barstow, 32.1 percent; Mill Valley, 31.3 percent; San Juan Capistrano, 29.7 percent; Loma Linda, 28.3 percent; Lodi, 24.9 percent; Compton, 24.8 percent; Laguna Niguel, 24.8 percent; Inglewood, 24.3 percent.160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set! LANCASTER – Lancaster home sale prices in July fell to their lowest price since February, while Palmdale prices rebounded to equal the record set there that same month. Lancaster’s median July price for both new and resale homes dipped to $325,000, down $10,000 from the month before, and Palmdale’s rose $10,000 to $375,000. Both cities’ median prices were the same as in February. Lancaster’s July median was 12.1 percent ahead of July 2005 prices, and Palmdale’s was 15.4 percent ahead, according to sales statistics released by the California Association of Realtors. Lancaster prices peaked at $340,000 in April. AD Quality Auto 360p 720p 1080p Top articles1/5READ MOREWhy these photogenic dumplings are popping up in Los AngelesStatewide, home sales decreased 29.9 percent in July compared with the same period a year ago, while the median price of an existing home decreased from to $567,360 from the record $575,800 set the previous month. July’s statewide price was 5.1 percent ahead of July 2005. “Today’s market is slowing as sellers maintain often unrealistic pricing expectations and buyers have more properties to choose from,” said CAR President Vince Malta said of the statewide situation. “In addition, unlike the slowdown we experienced in the 1990s, homeowners today are not under duress to sell due to job losses. The urgency that characterized the market for the last few years is now gone for all but well-priced properties.” With California’s homes-for-sale inventory levels double that of a year ago, annual price appreciation for the state slowed from the double-digit rates of 2005 to less than 10 percent this year, he said. However, the 7.5-month supply of homes for sale in July remains far below the peak of February 1991 – the worst of the 1990s home-sales slump – when there was an 18-month supply on the market. In Rosamond, the July median was $285,000, down from $295,000 in June and the record $297,500 set in April. Rosamond’s July median was 4.8 percent ahead of prices a year earlier.
The first pigs infected with the H1N1 influenza sweeping the globe have been found—but they’re a long way from Mexico, the suspected origin of the virus. There’s also some optimism that the human outbreak of the virus is not as threatening as earlier feared.The H1N1 influenza strain that as of today has caused 898 cases in humans living in 18 countries has finally been isolated from pigs, Canadian officials announced last night. The virus had never been found in pigs until now. A farm in Alberta, Canada, became concerned about sick pigs on 24 April, and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has since determined that the virus has infected 220 pigs out of a herd of 2200 animals. (An exclusive transcript of a press conference last night with Canadian health officials is after the jump.) The agency suspects that a farm worker who returned to Canada from Mexico on 12 April and went back to work 2 days later infected the pigs. Canadian researchers who did a genetic analysis of the virus in the pig found that it closely matches the H1N1 in humans. This type of transmission of a swine influenza may be a first, says Christopher Olsen, a swine influenza researcher at the School of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. “I honestly can’t think of an instance where we saw a swine virus move to humans and move back in this fashion.”Sign up for our daily newsletterGet more great content like this delivered right to you!Country *AfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBolivia, Plurinational State ofBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCongo, The Democratic Republic of theCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and Mcdonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)HondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinianPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRWANDASaint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint Maarten (Dutch part)SlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwanTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofVietnamVirgin Islands, BritishWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweI also wish to receive emails from AAAS/Science and Science advertisers, including information on products, services and special offers which may include but are not limited to news, careers information & upcoming events.Required fields are included by an asterisk(*)There is much concern that pigs infected with this H1N1 might become infected with a dangerous influenza virus from fowl, like the H5N1 that causes avian influenza, leading to a dangerous superbug. But Olsen says this is unlikely on large hog farms. “Most modern swine production facilities are single species. The days of a small farmer having pigs and fowl and other animals all mixing together is really unusual in terms of modern commercial swine. My opinion is modern swine facilities have better biosecurity than old-time farms.”Olsen also stresses that this finding is more a curiosity than a game changer. “This is an interesting event from a scientific perspective, but I don’t think it changes the current public health priorities at all.”The Canadian finding also dominated a press conference held in Geneva this afternoon by the World Health Organization (WHO). “It is not a big surprise,” said Peter Ben Embarek, a WHO food safety scientist. “We expected at some point since this virus has swine virus elements that we would find possible virus in pigs in the region where the virus is circulating,” said Embarek. Canada has quarantined the farm to prevent further spread. Embarek emphasized repeatedly that eating pork does not transmit the virus and that it only presents a danger to pig farmers and slaughterhouses. The farm worker has recovered, Embarek noted. “Also for the animal population, it doesn’t seem to be a very serious disease,” he said.WHO has not yet raised the threat level from phase 5 to phase 6, which would indicate that the H1N1 outbreak is a pandemic. For that to happen, a country in a region outside of the Americas would have to document sustained spread between humans in a community.The Mexican Health Minister, José Ángel Córdova, yesterday said that he believed the outbreak in his country was stabilizing. Mexico now has confirmed 506 cases and 19 deaths. But in a press conference held by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Anne Schuchat, the interim deputy director for science and public health, cautioned people to keep the champagne bottles corked. “I don’t think we’re out of the woods yet,” said Schuchat. Much is still unknown about the virus’s spread or severity, she stressed, adding that they cannot predict what it will do in the future. “We don’t know if the virus will return in the fall and come back harder than it is right now, and of course that’s one of the big concerns.”CDC now reports 226 confirmed U.S. cases and 30 hospitalizations, a dramatic increase from yesterday that she said reflects that health officials are catching up with the backlog of samples rather than an increase in the disease’s spread or its severity. In part this rise is because along with CDC, many state labs can now conduct confirmatory tests. “We know there are lots of probable cases out there,” said Schuchat. “I expect numbers to jump quite a bit in the next few days.”Transcript of News Conference – Honourable Leona Aglukkaq, Minister of Health – May 2, 2009 – 6:00 p.m.TRANSCRIPTION/TRANSCRIPTIONEVENT/ÉVÉNEMENTDATE/DATE: Saturday, May 2, 2009; 6:00 p.m., ESTLOCATION/ENDROIT: Ottawa, ONPRINCIPAL(S)/PRINCIPAUX: Honourable Leona Aglukkaq, Minister of Health CanadaDr. David Butler-Jones, Chief Public Health OfficerDr. Danielle Grondin, Acting Assistant Deputy MinisterDr. Brian Evans, CFIA Dr. Martine Dubuc, CFIAMr. Tim Vail, Director of Communications for Minister AglukkaqSUBJECT/SUJET: Minister Aglukkaq holds a news conference/ teleconference regarding the H1N1 flu outbreakMinister Aglukkaq: Thank you, and thank you all for once again for being here. First, 34 new cases of H1N1 flu virus were confirmed today. This brings the number of confirmed cases in Canada to 85. Thankfully all cases here in Canada remain mild.It is important that Canadians understand that we are taking a coordinated approach to dealing with this outbreak Our government is working together with our partners to respond to the situation at home and internationally. I also briefed the Prime Minister today and he continues to follow the situation.Late yesterday afternoon, Prime Minister Harper spoke with Mexican President Calderone to discuss the H1N1 influenza outbreak. President Calderone expressed his deep appreciation for Canada’s assistance which said has been critical to Mexico’s capacity to respond to the situation. They agreed that Canada and Mexico would continue to work together closely to mitigate the outbreak. Canada continues to offer support to Mexico including testing at the National Microbiology Lab and sending two additional scientists from the Public Health Agency to Mexico. As the number of confirmed cases continue to grow, it is more important than ever that we have a clear and coordinated approach to our communication. As we have seen in the past week, Canada is well positioned to deal with this outbreak. We have a national plan and we are implementing it. I also want to thank everyone here today for helping to share the messages about infection prevention, hand washing, covering coughs and sneezes with your arms are simple, effective measures that we can all take. Thank you and I would now like to turn to Dr. David Butler-Jones, Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer.Dr. Butler-Jones: Merci Madame la Ministre, et encore merci a tous de nous accorder votre attention.We continue to see mild cases and full recovery in Canada, but our vigilance and efforts need to continue and our heightened surveillance will lead to more and more confirmed cases. This is anticipated and we are prepared to deal with it.Part of our increased surveillance efforts include the sale of both prescription and off the shelf flu medications. Over 3,000 pharmacies across Canada are assisting in this effort. As we previously mentioned, tracking the first 100 cases of this virus, looking at who it affects and how is essential to our understanding of the H1N1 flu virus and to the process of developing a vaccine. Under the direction of Dr. Frank Plummer, scientist at the National Microbiology Laboratory have started full genome sequencing of the H1N1 flu virus. Les scientifiques du Laboratoire national de microbiologie on entrepris le décodage complet du génome. This research is very important. Many people are asking why the virus seems to be much more severe in Mexico while in Canada and in other parts of the world we continue to see mild cases. Genome sequencing of specimens from both Canada and Mexico will help us to understand if the virus has mutated which may help us to explain the increased severity of the cases in Mexico.Canada has also sent a total now of 7 epidemiologists and lab researchers to Mexico to assist in their ongoing disease investigation. Some will be helping with things like lab testing while others will go to say, rural Mexico to help do some disease detective work, like tracking down patient histories to find out where, when and how they were exposed. They are also working with the Mexican Ministry of Health to assist their international public health efforts. As the Minister mentioned, information on confirmed cases in Canada will be updated on a daily basis at 4 o’clock Eastern Daylight Time, and you can visit the Public Health Agency of Canada website at www.publichealth.gc.ca for more information. Now in Canada, we have 34 new cases today of the H1N1 flu virus, 7 in British Columbia, 7 in Alberta, 2 in Ontario, 1 in Quebec and 17 in Nova Scotia. This brings the number of confirmed cases in Canada to 85. Now, while the risk to most Canadians remains low, we all need to practice basic flu prevention techniques always.I would now like to turn to my colleague, Dr. Danielle Grondin.Dr. Grondin: Merci. Aujourd’hui en fait, je vais prendre seulement quelques minutes pour vous mettre a jour sur la situation au Canada. Trente quatre nouveau cas d’infection au virus influenza H1N1 ont été confirmé aujourd’hui au Canada: 7 en Colombie Britannique, 7 en Alberta, 2 en Ontario, 1 au Québec et 17 en Nouvelle Écosse. Cela porte at 85 le nombre de cas confirmé au Canada. Cette information, c’est à dire le nombre de cas confirmé au Canada sera publié chaque jour sur le site web de l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada at 14h00 heures avancé de l’est. Et maintenant je voudrais passer la parole a notre collègue Docteur Evans.Dr. Evans: Merci Danielle, thank you David, thank you Minister. My name is Brian Evans. I am the Chief Veterinary Officer for Canada.As Canada’s animal health regulatory agency, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has been playing a supporting role to the Public Health Agency in terms of both technical expertise and collaboration throughout the H1N1 influenza issue. In addition, since April 24, we have been working closely with provinces, territories, the swine sector and private veterinarians in order to enhance the awareness and monitoring of swine herds for any change of health status or illness. Through this very surveillance, and close collaboration with public health authorities the CFIA was informed of a situation involving a Canadian who recently returned from Mexico on April 12 and undertook to do work on a swine farm in Alberta on April 14. This person was exhibiting flu-like symptoms following their return, and may have exposed swine on the farm to an influenza virus. I can tell you that the traveller has recovered. I will let my public health colleagues further address that element of the situation.With respect to the pigs, there were increased signs of flu-like illness after the contractor had been on the farm, but these animals as well are on their way to recovery. Samples from the pigs are being analysed at our shared Winnipeg facility. We have determined that the virus H1N1 Influenza A found in these pigs is the virus which is being tracked in the human population. Further analysis is underway to provide more insight and contribute to ongoing research efforts.Seeing influenza infections in pigs is very common, and the transfer of influenza virus from humans to pigs is known to occur. Pigs are known to be susceptible to influenza viruses from humans, from other pigs, and from birds. Fortunately, infected pigs almost alway recover on their own within a week or so. Whatever virus these pigs were exposed to is behaving in that exact manner as those we regularly see circulating in North America and in swine herds in virtually every nation around the world. Normally, finding influenza in pigs would not generate any specific response from the CFIA, but obviously the situation is somewhat different, and our response aligns accordingly. The herd has been placed under quarantine and we are working with our public health colleagues to determine the most appropriate next steps to ensure that both public health and animal health remain paramount and protected. The chance that these pigs could transfer a virus to a person is remote, nevertheless we are following an appropriately measured approach.I want to be clear right now that there is no food safety concerns related to this finding. Consumption of pork is not considered a route of transmission to humans. The World Health Organization and other authorities all agree on this point. These animals are not a food safety risk. The CFIA is closely collaborating with public health officials to investigate any other situations where people with flu like illness may have had contact with swine. In addition, it is important to note that pigs in Canada are tested and monitored for influenza viruses on an ongoing basis across the country. Unfortunately, we have already seen certain trading partners implement trading restrictions based of the detection of H1N1 influenza virus in humans. We do not believe such restrictions are warranted. This is not simply our view, but that of the international science reference bodies for human health, the World Health Organization, and animal health, the World Health Organization for Animal Health.The key here is that influenza virus do not affect the safety of pork, therefore, we are calling on the international community to ensure that they base their decisions on facts not fears. This is not the time for the international community to establish precedence which serve to confuse rather than inform the pubic. On this matter, I am pleased to report that Minister Gerry Ritz has had discussions with his counterpart, Secretary Vilsack in the United States and has been assured that this in no way changes the trading relationship between our countries.I want to thank you for the opportunity to share this information with the public and we will continue to keep Canadians apprised as we move forward.Thank you and I would like to introduce my colleague Dr. Martine Dubuc.Dr. Dubuc: Madame la ministre, messieurs les journalistes, l’Agence canadienne d’inspections des aliments en tant qu’autorité réglementaire relative à la santé animal collabore avec l’Agence de santé publique due Canada pour offrir le support scientifique et technique au regard de l’influenza H1N1. Depuis le 24 avril dernier, l’Agence canadienne a rehaussée son niveau de surveillance et travail de façon très étroite avec les provinces, les territoires, l’industrie porcine, et les médecins vétérinaires en pratique privé afin d’améliorer la surveillance dans les troupeaux de porc mais également dans l’ensemble de la population animal au Canada.Au cours de cette période de surveillance mené en étroite collaboration avec les autorités de santé publique, l’Agence canadienne d’inspection des aliments a été informé qu’un canadien revenu du Mexique le 12 avril a travaillé sur une exploitation porcine en Alberta. L’individu ayant séjourné récemment au Mexique présentais des symptômes similaire à ceux de la grippe. Par conséquent, les porcs de cette exploitation agricole pourrait donc avoir été exposés au virus de l’influenza A H1N1. Cet individu a eu des symptômes similaires à ceux de la grippe, mais actuellement est rétablit et nos collègues de la santé publique expliqueront d’avantage cette aspect de la situation. Quant au porc de l’exploitation agricole, après la visite de ce travailleur sur la ferme, ils ont commencer a présenter les symptômes respiratoires similaire à ceux de la grippe, mais ces porcs sont également aujourd’hui en voie de rétablissement. Dans le cas de son investigation, l’Agence canadienne d’inspection des aliments à pris des échantillons provenant des porcs et les analyses on été fait à notre laboratoire à Winnipeg. Jusqu’à maintenant, les analyses ont détectées la virus du de l’influenza A H1N1. Le laboratoire effectue toutefois d’autres tests pour continuer a améliorer ses connaissance et comprendre la nature de ce nouveau virus. Il n’est pas anormale ou exceptionnel de dépister le virus de l’influenza A chez les porcs. Il arrive même parfois que le virus soit transféré des humains à des porcs. Les porcs peuvent également contracter le virus de l’influenza A car ils sont aussi vulnérables à ce virus qui peu être transmit par les humains, par les porcs, mais également les oiseaux.Les porcs infestés infectés se rétablissent presque toujours d’eux même à environ une semaine. Le virus donc qui a infecté le troupeau actuellement en question se comporte de façon similaire à d’autre virus d’influenza A qui circulent régulièrement en Amérique du nord. Normalement, d’habitude l’Agence ne prend pas de mesures particulières lorsqu’on constate des cas d’influenza A dans les élevages de porc. Toutefois, la situation actuelle est bien sûr bien différente, et c’est pourquoi actuellement, le troupeau a été placé en quarantaine. Nous continuons de collaborer avec nos collègues de la santé publique en vue de définir les mesures appropriés a prendre pour protéger la santé publique et la santé animale. Les risques que ces porcs transmettes le virus à des personnes actuellement sont très faibles. Néanmoins, nous poursuivons et suivons une approche prudente et approprié. Je veut préciser aussi clairement que cette situation ne pose aucun danger pour la salubrité des aliments. La consommation de porc n’est pas considérée comme une voie de transmission du virus. L’Organisation mondial de la santé et d’autres responsables sont unanimes sur ce fait. Encore une fois, ces animaux ne constituent pas un risque pour la salubrité des aliments. L’Agence canadienne d’inspection des aliments collabore étroitement avec les responsables de la santé publique pour enquêter sur d’autres situations ou des gens manifestant des symptômes semblables à ceux de la grippe pourraient avoir été en contact avec des porcs.Il est important de noté que les porcs au Canada sont également régulièrement testés et subissent des épreuves de dépistages de l’influenza partout au Canada. Malheureusement, actuellement, certains de nos partenaires commerciaux ont déjà imposés des restrictions commerciales liées au virus influenza A H1N1. Nous ne croyons pas que ces restrictions soient justifiés. Ce point de vu est partagé par des organismes internationaux de référence scientifique dans le domaine autant de la santé humaine que la santé animal. Le point a retenir est que les virus de l’influenza n’ont aucune incidence sur la salubrité du porc, et par conséquent, nous demandons à nos partenaires commerciaux fondé leur décision sur les faits et non la peur. Aujourd’hui le Ministre Ritz a parlé au secrétaire américain de l’agriculture, Monsieur Tom Vilsack pour informer nos voisin américain de la situation. Il s’est assuré que les producteurs de porc canadiens continuerons d’avoir accès au marché américain.J’aimerais vous remercier de nous avoir donné aujourd’hui cette occasion de partagé avec vous ces renseignement avec le publique, et nous continueront de tenir les canadiens de tout faits nouveaux sur cette situation.Mr. Vail: And now we are ready for your questions. Please limit your questions to one and one follow-up. Si vous avez des questions juste poser deux, s’il vous plaît.Question: Brian with CFRB, Toronto, CJD, Montreal. You said that for several days that eating pork is not a problem. You said today that transmission swine to human is not a problem, but you have to realize that this will scare people, freak them out a little bit when they hear that pigs got it from humans even if it may be sound normal to you, to the average person they may not know that. So how do you reassure them today that well it won’t happen the other way, that it’s for greater concern?Dr. Butler-Jones: Certainly, two things about that I guess, firstly as it’s been said, we do see from time to time and this is something that people would not know that in fact human viruses can be spread to pig. We do see that from time to time. Occasionally we do see swine viruses in humans, but again maybe once a year in Canada. So it’s not a common event, but it does occur. And so we would expect to actually see this at some point in the whole process with a new human virus. In the situation of sort of reassurance, one of the reasons for watching this very closely is because of the potential for passing the virus back from pigs to humans. And so that’s something we need to be very careful about. That’s part of the reason why the farm is quarantined, that’s why there is a close collaboration between public health and CFIA. The point being though, we are not seeing this virus anywhere else in Canada in pigs. We do not see this as a risk passing and certainly in terms of the eating of pork that is not a problem. And if you ate it before, there is absolutely no reason not to eat it today. Dr. Evans: Thank you David and we appreciate the question and I would add to that again, just to re-emphasize we live in a one health, one world reality. Bacteria, viruses, pathogens, they are not overly selective to any species if they can find a way to multiply. And so as David indicated this finding in itself is not an outstanding or an unusual event even specific to this particular virus circumstance. I think it’s also important for people to bear in mind the reality again that what we are dealing with here is a fairly unique circumstance having had the exposure in Mexico directly with the swine heard. And we can assure that across the board in Canada since the 24th of April, farmers across this country are re-enforcing bio security guidelines. There has been a lot of publicity around issues of people how they should go on to farms, how they come off of farms being distributed by both veterinary practitioners and with producers through the industry. A lot of information out there, of how producers out there can make sure that their premises are in fact well secured from any further exposure. As we have indicated in this particular farm, this is a vertically integrated farm, it has piglets that move through this farm, there is no sales off this farm to any other farm in Canada. There are no purchases onto this farm from any other farm in Canada. So again we believe that the containment that is place, we are dealing with is a very unique event. In all fairness, I want to give full credit to the veterinary profession and to the Province of Alberta for what I think was outstanding early detective work, early detection and early reporting which we all collectively agree as how we will manage on a go forward basis.Question: As far, you said there is a concern that you want to monitor the potential for this to switch back and forth. Is that a concern that once it passes from human back into pigs then it mutates and becomes more difficult for you to track and deal with it. You’ve got 2 different strains out there in the human population?Dr. Butler-Jones: So far basically what we are seeing in the pig is the same strain as we see in the humans. The concern is that if it’s circulating in a pig herd that any other humans come onto the farm might be exposed and be at risk, so we want to protect them against that. At anytime, not just in the situation but on anywhere we know that this is a very, very adaptive virus that can at any point recombine with a mix of human, pig, or bird gene material. And so that’s something we are constantly watching for. It’s not a common event that you see that where it’s adapted to humans. I mean the last time that we saw a virus spread this easily, a new influenza virus different from anything we’ve seen was in the 1960’s really, so it is, it’s not common but it’s unpredictable. So that’s why we watch it very carefully.Question: Julie Van Nussen, CBC. This is very confusing, all of it. I don’t get most of it. But the point is, if people can have this virus to pigs, why can’t pigs pass it back to people?Dr. Butler-Jones: Well they could, that’s why on this farm, because it’s a human virus, so the difference, what you have to think about this virus which is essentially a human virus spreading from person to person that can in this case we’ve shown, in fact a herd of pigs. Whether it can move from pig herd to other pig herds, that we don’t know yet, but it’s an isolated case on this farm. That does not mean that other viruses are transferring from pigs to human. So in this specific instance we know it’s a human virus that can spread. It’s in a pig so if it came back, if some other human handled that pig while it was ill, or was, droplets got them in their mouth or eyes then potentially that person could infected from that pig with this virus which is a human virus. So that’s what we need to be focussed on.Dr. Evans: I would just add to that, thank you for the question again, I would just add to that, that David indicated at this point an time the issue of being a human virus having been introduced to the pigs and the characterization of this virus shows that it is still that virus. There has been no adaptation identified through the transfer from human to the pigs at this time. So it doesn’t change its expression in humans subsequent to that. What is really important I think also to understand, then again I think this is where Canada benefits over so many other countries is the fact that we have the Winnipeg lab facility with the co-location of both the public health and animal health components of this. And the research that’s already been initiated there will actually move into these areas to determine whether this virus can be spread from swine to other swine, whether this virus can be adapted to birds, whether it can be adapted to horses, other species that do circulate influenza viruses. That’s part of the research that is being done and we are uniquely positioned in Canada in the Winnipeg facility.Question: So your saying you don’t know a lot about this is all working, so what makes you think that people would be convinced that it’s safe to eat pork?Dr. Evans: Well again, I think I come back to the fact that influenza viruses has been reported, has circulated in swine populations on an ongoing basis for many, many decades. It’s been well researched, by studies, by world organizations, by the Centre for Disease Control in Atlanta, other organizations that have all unanimously come to the conclusion that consumption of pork is not a risk factor for transmission of influenza virus from swine to human.Question: This strain though H1N1 this has been found in pigs before?Dr. Evans No we are saying that this particular virus based on what we are seeing clinical expression at this point and time, the introduction of the virus into the pig herd, the pigs have responded in the same way that they have responded to every other swine virus, or circulating influenza virus. Mild respiratory signs, mild appetite loss, mild fever with recovery within the expected time frame. So the early indications are this virus does not affect pigs in any way differently. We will be doing more work in that area obviously. But also from the pork perspective I think people have to bare in mind that pigs that are submitted to slaughter in Canada as in many countries are subjected to clinical inspection on arrival to verify health status. Pigs that are notably distressed are not illegible to be slaughtered and as they go through the slaughter process there is veterinary inspection that looks issues and with the removal of lungs and those tissues, if there is any evidence of pneumonia or abscesses or that sort of thing, those pigs do not get into the feed supply.Question: Once those pigs are well, will they be okay to eat. Will you sell them to eat?Dr. Evans: As I said earlier there has no decision taken at this time in terms of where we will go beyond the quarantine that we are currently at.Question: If you are so sure they are going to be okay, why can’t you just sell them for people to eat?Dr. Evans Again I think there are other factors that we have to consider and this beyond simply the animal health and food safety factors. We have to look at the animal welfare issue of this particular farm and their ability to hold pigs to market weight with restrictions that are in place. We have to look at the impact on the producer, we have to look also at also in the circumstances David had said. We want to get a better understanding with this virus having been introduced to pigs is an opportunity over time that this virus could recombine or resort. Those sort of considerations would also be part of a go forward decision.Question: But would you eat those pigs?Dr. Evans Can we keep it to just one….Question: I want to know, I want to know. You need to clear this up. Those pigs are sick, you are treating them. They are going to get better. You are telling us it’s okay to eat pork, I just want to know would you eat those pigs once they are better?Dr. Evans As I’ve indicated these pigs are responding well, they are regaining their clinical health without treatment as pigs would do and my estimation on that is this pig situation and the time that has passed and with all the factors at play, I would have no issue eating pork from these pigs. That’s my personal position. But again I think we have to be able to go further than my personal position and demonstrate to the Canadian public and the global public that we are treating this thing with due respect for all factors that have to be considered.Question: Steve Reddie from the Canadian Press. I wonder if you could give some more information about the particular herd that was affected, the size of the herd, when they started to show signs of the flu, whether other people on that farm decided that when that farm hand got sick and whether they have tested positive for the swine flu (inaudible)?Dr. Evans I’ll try to make sure Steve that I’ve got all of those questions captured to the best of my ability. As we’ve indicated clinical, the exposure on the farm took place on the 14th of April, the issue of their change in health status occurred around the 24th, 25th of April, with subsequent recovery in the 5 days that followed from that. The operation itself, as I’ve indicated is what we call farrow to finish, so this breeder has his own sows on the farm which have young pigs which he keeps on the farm, grows them out and their only exit from the farm on a rotational basis as the young pigs come through the older pigs meet market weight, and they are shipped out for slaughter as their end destination.The size of the operation, it has currently on the farm about 220 sows and piglets and 1,800 growing pigs that are in various stages of their growth.Dr. Butler-Jones: One other person on the farm had symptoms, has been tested, we don’t have the results of the test. Mild illness and recovering as we’ve seen elsewhere. So even if it is this virus that seems to be a continuing pattern.Question: What about, I guess the assumption was always that the virus may have started in pigs and then transmitted to humans and then humans started passing it on each other as a humans virus. Does that, does all this change your assumption at all about whether it did really started in pigs way back when and then?Dr. Butler-Jones What we are learning all the time, as I’ve said before, the influenza virus is very adaptive, very innovative. Again the question is, it’s not a pig virus because we are not seeing it circulating in pigs. So it’s a recombination of a number of sort of the North American strain that’s been circulating for a long time, your Asian strain that we have not seen circulating in North America. So where that came from and how it adapted into humans, we haven’t even found this virus previously in pigs other than in this situation where it came from a human, as a human virus. So we still have a lot to learn about this, but I wouldn’t presume, I mean it’s a swine in terms of it’s, the components of the virus are largely from pigs originally. But did it mutate in a pig or did it mutate in a human combined with some other elements of a human that allowed to adapt, that we don’t know. We may never know, but certainly it’s shown itself with it’s ability to be a human virus and that’s really what we are dealing with at this point and more will come as we understand the virus better.Question: Hi, Sharon Kirky with CanWest News. You talked about the size of the operation, can you tell us how many pigs are actually infected with the virus?Dr. Evans: Again the information that we currently have is there were no deaths on the farm associated on the pig side and about 10% of the pigs showed some indications of what we would normally attribute to flu-like symptoms.Question: And is this the first known case in the world of the countries that are experiencing outbreak of human swine influenza where you’ve seen the flu infect a pig?Dr. Evans: That’s true, this is the first detection that has been made and I think that’s reflective of the two primary issues. One is the circumstance of exposure that took place. I know other countries are actively looking and I come back to the fact that I think Canada is probably strategically advantaged in this way again because of the co-location of the Winnipeg lab. We are probable one of the first countries that were able to extrapolate a diagnostic test that had been developed on the human side to the pigs circumstances. In most other countries in the world you would not that close animal health, public health collaboration, so I think we have diagnostic tools currently which other countries may not be applying to their surveillance program. And I think it’s Canada part of our leadership is, we will be undertaking to share those tools to help countries in their effort as well.Question: And the last question. Are you concerned that you, you know what might happen here is you have countries saying they are going to refuse to buy our pork products because of this. How do you address that?Dr. Evans: Well again even in advance of the finding of the human transfer to pigs, we have started to see some of that reaction in certain countries. I think we respond to it in several ways. Many of those countries took those positions in advance of having found human cases themselves. You know I think part of that is the sobering effect of now saying well we have the same circumstance in our country. Are we messaging in the appropriate way? And so, what’s our rationale for taking this decision based on science and human health protection and consumer interests or were there other factors there?. So we are hopeful that that message will continue to sink in. At the same time we will continue to work with the world organizations both at WHO and through the world organization for animal health the OIE to make sure that information is shared with all countries on a transparent and open basis of the work that we have done. I think Canada has had over the past number of years between the challenges we’ve had with avian influenza, BSE circumstance. I think we’ve built up a very strong credibility around the world for how we respond when diseases are found. I think that stands us in good stead. The countries based on the fact that we have been able to demonstrate that this is contained at this point to a single farm. No outlying contacts. I think people viewing that information that understand the dynamics of this virus will come to the conclusion, in fact, that we’ve done what the world community would expect us to do, and that we expect that they will recognize it accordingly.Question: Are you considering slaughtering the pigs?Mr. Vail: I’m sorry that’s going to have to conclude our press conference today, thank you very much.
Vice President Mike Pence made a stop in Alaska on Monday.Listen nowPence visited Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage before continuing on to Japan and South Korea. He’s part of a U.S. delegation that will attend the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics in South Korea this Friday.But at JBER, part of the vice president’s focus was on sending a message to North Korea.The vice president’s staff said in a written statement last month that Pence’s visit to Alaska and the Korean Peninsula would send a message of American resolve to North Korea’s leaders, as well as one of support for U.S. Olympic athletes and military service members stationed in the region.Captain Bryant Davis, a spokesperson for the U.S. Alaskan Command, said Pence planned to hear from several different military commanders at JBER.“During his visit, they’ll talk about the strategic importance of Alaska,” Davis said. “And because of our position at the top of the Northern Hemisphere, you really reach pretty much any major location in the Northern Hemisphere within hours by aircraft. So it’s a very strategic and important location for homeland defense and homeland security.”Pence was also set to discuss the ballistic missile defense system. That includes dozens of interceptor missiles at Fort Greely in the Interior designed to guard against the type of nuclear attack that the North Korean regime has threatened in the past.The vice president was scheduled to land at the base around 5 p.m. He planned to be on the ground in Alaska for a little less than two hours.